<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brother André Marie's Weblog &#187; Modernism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/category/modernism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brotherandre.stblogs.com</link>
	<description>By Brother André Marie, M.I.C.M. Dedicated to Saint Joseph the Betrothed, Patron and Protector of the Universal Church</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:36:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>In Defense of Christmas</title>
		<link>http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2009/05/04/in-defense-of-christmas/</link>
		<comments>http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2009/05/04/in-defense-of-christmas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 17:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brother André Marie, M.I.C.M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liturgy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modernism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/?p=132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today&#8217;s skeptics, who seem to reject something traditional just because it&#8217;s traditional, cannot sit still during the holy season of Christmas without mocking the notion that Christ would have been born on December 25th.  If it were just the unbelievers who engaged in this mockery, it would be expected, since unbelievers, by their very nature, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2009/05/04/in-defense-of-christmas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Heresy of Dual-Covenant Theology</title>
		<link>http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2008/01/28/the-heresy-of-dual-covenant-theology/</link>
		<comments>http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2008/01/28/the-heresy-of-dual-covenant-theology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brother André Marie, M.I.C.M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modernism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2008/01/28/the-heresy-of-dual-covenant-theology/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have just finished reading &#8220;The Old Covenant: Revoked or Not Revoked?&#8221; by Dr. Robert Sungenis. It is a study debunking the notion, now regnant in liberal theological circles, that the Old Covenant still stands side-by-side with the New Covenant. According to this novelty, in essence, God&#8217;s &#8220;A Plan&#8221; and God&#8217;s &#8220;B Plan&#8221; are both [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2008/01/28/the-heresy-of-dual-covenant-theology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vatican II: Some Clarity, Please</title>
		<link>http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2007/10/18/vatican-ii-some-clarity-please/</link>
		<comments>http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2007/10/18/vatican-ii-some-clarity-please/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brother André Marie, M.I.C.M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ecclesiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magisterium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modernism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacred Scripture and Tradition: Sources of Revelation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vatican II]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2007/10/18/vatican-ii-%e2%80%94-some-clarity-please/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, I witnessed a very animated discussion between a Scripture scholar and a religion teacher. The subject of the disputation was Biblical inerrancy. The scholar is a highly intelligent man, but a liberal. (In fairness to him, I must say that he avoids the more ridiculous ideas of biblical scholars, such as the fantastic &#8220;Q [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2007/10/18/vatican-ii-some-clarity-please/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recent Posts on Modernism</title>
		<link>http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2007/09/10/recent-posts-on-modernism/</link>
		<comments>http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2007/09/10/recent-posts-on-modernism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brother André Marie, M.I.C.M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modernism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2007/09/10/recent-posts-on-modernism/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The last three posts were all on Modernism, or subjects closely related to Modernism. This is my (slightly belated) celebration of the 100th anniversary of Pascendi Dominici Gregis, Pope St. Pius X&#8217;s wonderful encyclical condemning that heresy. The encyclical was published on September 8, 1907, the Feast of Our Lady&#8217;s Nativity.
The vigilant pope&#8217;s definitive condemnation [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2007/09/10/recent-posts-on-modernism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the Popes and Other Catholic Leaders in the 19th Century Responded to Modernity</title>
		<link>http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2007/09/10/how-the-popes-and-other-catholic-leaders-in-the-19th-century-responded-to-modernity/</link>
		<comments>http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2007/09/10/how-the-popes-and-other-catholic-leaders-in-the-19th-century-responded-to-modernity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brother André Marie, M.I.C.M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Church History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modernism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2007/09/10/how-the-popes-and-other-catholic-leaders-in-the-19th-century-responded-to-modernity/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The eighteenth-century Enlightenment mounted a severe offensive against the Church, one which combined various malignant cultural and intellectual trends that had gradually come into ascendancy since the Renaissance. &#8220;For the most part, the Church did not respond to this attack very well.&#8221;[1] However, the nineteenth century saw a change in this, &#8220;an immense religious revival, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2007/09/10/how-the-popes-and-other-catholic-leaders-in-the-19th-century-responded-to-modernity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Relationship of Americanism to Modernism</title>
		<link>http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2007/09/10/the-relationship-of-americanism-to-modernism/</link>
		<comments>http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2007/09/10/the-relationship-of-americanism-to-modernism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brother André Marie, M.I.C.M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Church History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modernism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2007/09/10/the-relationship-of-americanism-to-modernism/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be a gross oversimplification to put an equal sign between the words &#8220;Americanism&#8221; and &#8220;Modernism,&#8221; as if the former were merely the American embodiment of the latter. However, while we must avoid this facile identification of the two, so too must we appreciate the points of agreement between them. Not only were there [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2007/09/10/the-relationship-of-americanism-to-modernism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What did St. Pius X mean when he called Modernism &#8220;the synthesis of all heresies&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2007/09/09/what-did-st-pius-x-mean-when-he-called-modernism-the-synthesis-of-all-heresies/</link>
		<comments>http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2007/09/09/what-did-st-pius-x-mean-when-he-called-modernism-the-synthesis-of-all-heresies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 18:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brother André Marie, M.I.C.M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Church History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modernism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2007/09/09/what-did-st-pius-x-mean-when-he-called-modernism-the-synthesis-of-all-heresies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This phrase &#8211; &#8220;the synthesis of all heresies&#8221; &#8211; shows up toward the end of the Encyclical Pascendi Dominici Gregis, placed in the context of a rhetorical question.[1] After an apology for taking so long to explore the entire scope of the Modernist doctrines, even disclosing &#8220;certain uncouth terms in use among the Modernists,&#8221;[2] the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2007/09/09/what-did-st-pius-x-mean-when-he-called-modernism-the-synthesis-of-all-heresies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
