<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Four Kinds of Magisterial Statement and the Various Responses Catholics Owe to Each</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2008/01/03/the-four-kinds-of-magisterial-statement-and-the-various-responses-catholics-owe-to-each/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2008/01/03/the-four-kinds-of-magisterial-statement-and-the-various-responses-catholics-owe-to-each/</link>
	<description>By Brother André Marie, M.I.C.M. Dedicated to Saint Joseph the Betrothed, Patron and Protector of the Universal Church</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:54:30 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Catholicism.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; «Ad Rem» N° 58 (1/7/2008): Epiphany Octave</title>
		<link>http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2008/01/03/the-four-kinds-of-magisterial-statement-and-the-various-responses-catholics-owe-to-each/comment-page-1/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>Catholicism.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; «Ad Rem» N° 58 (1/7/2008): Epiphany Octave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2008/01/03/the-four-kinds-of-magisterial-statement-and-the-various-responses-catholics-owe-to-each/#comment-242</guid>
		<description>[...] Posted on the Theology Blog is “The Four Kinds of Magisterial Statement and the Various Responses Catholics Owe to Each” and a summary of why sanctity is important for Catholics but meaningless in the Protestant [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posted on the Theology Blog is “The Four Kinds of Magisterial Statement and the Various Responses Catholics Owe to Each” and a summary of why sanctity is important for Catholics but meaningless in the Protestant [...]
<div style='clear:both'></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2008/01/03/the-four-kinds-of-magisterial-statement-and-the-various-responses-catholics-owe-to-each/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2008/01/03/the-four-kinds-of-magisterial-statement-and-the-various-responses-catholics-owe-to-each/#comment-195</guid>
		<description>Yes, I agree, the teaching against contraception is part of the second category, truths de fide tenenda. Infallible and irreformable. Maybe not explicitly or directly contained as a separate truth in the Publically Revealed deposit of faith, but nevertheless infallibly taught as logically following from the general revelation on chasity and on the ends of human sexuality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style='float: right; margin-left: 10px;' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=102570741082b6a2d11ad72ac6afa0bc&amp;size=60&amp;default=http%3A%2F%2Fuse.perl.org%2Fimages%2Fpix.gif' alt='' />Yes, I agree, the teaching against contraception is part of the second category, truths de fide tenenda. Infallible and irreformable. Maybe not explicitly or directly contained as a separate truth in the Publically Revealed deposit of faith, but nevertheless infallibly taught as logically following from the general revelation on chasity and on the ends of human sexuality.
<div style='clear:both'></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brother André Marie, M.I.C.M.</title>
		<link>http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2008/01/03/the-four-kinds-of-magisterial-statement-and-the-various-responses-catholics-owe-to-each/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Brother André Marie, M.I.C.M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2008/01/03/the-four-kinds-of-magisterial-statement-and-the-various-responses-catholics-owe-to-each/#comment-148</guid>
		<description>Statements of the third category are reformable. However, the Church&#039;s teaching on birth control is infallible. I do not agree with Dr. D&#039;Ambrosio on this point. I think he&#039;s wrong, and seriously wrong. This teaching is something so clearly taught by all tradition as to be irreformable, by virtue of the ordinary and universal magisterium. 

Thank you for giving me the opportunity to clarify this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style='float: right; margin-left: 10px;' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=5e8062d959767176b449fd3809c88ae7&amp;size=60&amp;default=http%3A%2F%2Fuse.perl.org%2Fimages%2Fpix.gif' alt='' />Statements of the third category are reformable. However, the Church&#8217;s teaching on birth control is infallible. I do not agree with Dr. D&#8217;Ambrosio on this point. I think he&#8217;s wrong, and seriously wrong. This teaching is something so clearly taught by all tradition as to be irreformable, by virtue of the ordinary and universal magisterium. </p>
<p>Thank you for giving me the opportunity to clarify this.
<div style='clear:both'></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Flynn</title>
		<link>http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2008/01/03/the-four-kinds-of-magisterial-statement-and-the-various-responses-catholics-owe-to-each/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Flynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2008/01/03/the-four-kinds-of-magisterial-statement-and-the-various-responses-catholics-owe-to-each/#comment-147</guid>
		<description>Is i t correct to say that teaching of the third category, which requires &quot;religious assent of mind and will,&quot; is not infallible and, therefore, is reformable?

If the above is true, then, since you quote Dr. D&#039;Ambrosio without question, that &quot;the Church’s condemnation of artificial birth control&quot; is in this category, does that mean the Church&#039;s condemnation of artificial birth control is reformable?

Thank you
Don</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style='float: right; margin-left: 10px;' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=0303e1cb1e9f80ff10ea92c674484fba&amp;size=60&amp;default=http%3A%2F%2Fuse.perl.org%2Fimages%2Fpix.gif' alt='' />Is i t correct to say that teaching of the third category, which requires &#8220;religious assent of mind and will,&#8221; is not infallible and, therefore, is reformable?</p>
<p>If the above is true, then, since you quote Dr. D&#8217;Ambrosio without question, that &#8220;the Church’s condemnation of artificial birth control&#8221; is in this category, does that mean the Church&#8217;s condemnation of artificial birth control is reformable?</p>
<p>Thank you<br />
Don
<div style='clear:both'></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
